Comparison of different methods for spatial analysis of cancer data in Utah.

TitleComparison of different methods for spatial analysis of cancer data in Utah.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2008
AuthorsBall W, LeFevre S, Jarup L, Beale L
JournalEnviron Health Perspect
Volume116
Issue8
Pagination1120-4
Date Published2008 Aug
ISSN0091-6765
KeywordsEnvironmental Exposure, Epidemiologic Methods, Humans, Incidence, Kidney Neoplasms, Lung Neoplasms, Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin, Risk Assessment, Software, Utah
Abstract

BACKGROUND: The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) and SaTScan software are used by the Environmental Epidemiology Program (EEP), Utah Department of Health, to investigate health concerns and exposures in Utah (USA). Recently, the EEP acquired the Rapid Inquiry Facility (RIF). The RIF enables access of additional dimensions of data, identifies potentially exposed populations, and computes disease rates and relative risk statistics for that potentially exposed population. OBJECTIVE: In this article we present a comparison of the SIR, SaTScan, and RIF methodologies in an investigation of cancer rates in residents living over contaminated groundwater plumes near Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) in Utah. METHODS: For this study, we used cancer data from the Utah Cancer Registry for cancers of the lung, kidney, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. We used SIR and the RIF to investigate the cancer rate in a defined population within the study area during six consecutive 5-year time intervals (1975-2004). We used SaTScan and the RIF to explore the study area for clusters. RESULTS: The RIF risk analysis and SIR are mathematically identical. SIR is set up and computed by programming SAS; the RIF risk analysis, on the other hand, is set up through four menu-driven steps. The RIF disease-mapping feature enhanced the interpretation of SaTScan results. We found kidney and lung cancer to be statistically elevated for the potentially exposed population for one and two periods, respectively. SaTScan found two clusters, one outside the potentially exposed population and one that included a portion of that population. CONCLUSION: The RIF is an easy-to-use and useful tool that extends the ability of the investigator to conduct analysis of disease rates and interpret the findings.

DOI10.1289/ehp.10815
Alternate JournalEnviron. Health Perspect.
PubMed ID18709141